The Diagnosis

mrt

Every per­son affect­ed can tell you a thing or two about it. Find­ing a doc­tor who takes the symp­toms described seri­ous­ly is just as ardu­ous as the path to a (poten­tial) diag­no­sis. When those affect­ed look back, many things some­times become clear­er and they wish that some­one had come up with the idea of tak­ing a look out­side the pigeon­holes soon­er.

Neu­ro­log­i­cal dis­eases in par­tic­u­lar are very diverse, so it is per­fect­ly okay if the usu­al sus­pects are checked out first. It’s just a shame if it’s left at that. In my case, for exam­ple, MS and Lyme dis­ease were first sus­pect­ed and ruled out by var­i­ous tests. The neu­rol­o­gist did see that some mus­cles were atro­phied and some nerves were bare­ly reg­is­ter­ing, but he did­n’t find that to be par­tic­u­lar­ly notice­able. Neu­rol­o­gist No. 1 want­ed to leave it at that and exam­ine me again after half a year.

Because of a sur­gi­cal prob­lem (delayed wound heal­ing) I was mean­while in anoth­er doctor’s office. The treat­ing sur­geon direct­ly sus­pect­ed a spe­cif­ic polyneu­ropa­thy. With this I went to Neu­rol­o­gist No. 2, who did sim­i­lar exam­i­na­tions and was again sur­prised that cer­tain nerves in the leg did not give any feed­back and he also dis­cov­ered atro­phied mus­cles. But Neu­rol­o­gist No. 2 did­n’t find that wor­ri­some either.

Because of an addi­tion­al blad­der prob­lem I went to the urol­o­gist. After sev­er­al appoint­ments and exam­i­na­tions, he diag­nosed a neu­ro­genic blad­der, which could pos­si­bly be relat­ed to the neu­ro­log­i­cal dis­ease. With his refer­ral, I then went to Neurol­o­gist No. 3, who final­ly took my com­plaints seri­ous­ly. She had not­ed a fail­ure of var­i­ous reflex­es and also the delayed nerve con­duc­tion veloc­i­ties.

It was here that hered­i­tary sen­so­ri­mo­tor neu­ropa­thy was first sus­pect­ed. In Ger­many more com­mon is the abbre­vi­at­ed form HMSN or more com­mon­ly in Eng­lish CMT (Char­cot-Marie-Tooth).

This sus­pi­cion was now to be con­firmed. First in a human genet­ics lab­o­ra­to­ry, where Pan­el 1 and lat­er Pan­el 2 were test­ed. This means that a num­ber of genes known to trig­ger the dis­ease are exam­ined. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, nei­ther study shed any light on the dis­ease. But that does not rule out the pos­si­bil­i­ty that it is not. Due to the fact that it is a rare dis­ease, there are also not many doc­tors and researchers study­ing it.

Only 70% of those suf­fer­ing from CMT can be iden­ti­fied by the first genet­ic test. Of the remain­ing 30%, human geneti­cists only find it in 20%-40%. The search now becomes much more dif­fi­cult, because the lat­er CMT man­i­fests itself in the affect­ed per­son, the poor­er the hit rate. At the same time, the num­ber of gene muta­tions is so large even in a healthy per­son that the effort to find exact­ly the gene defect respon­si­ble for the dis­ease in the affect­ed per­son is extreme­ly high.

In the end, this means that there are still some affect­ed peo­ple who have to live with the sus­pect­ed diag­no­sis. Very help­ful is my neu­rol­o­gist, who not only cer­ti­fies the sus­pect­ed diag­no­sis, but also the con­se­quences of the polyneu­ropa­thy as tetra­pare­sis. This diag­no­sis has been and con­tin­ues to be very help­ful in offi­ci­at­ing.

Recent find­ings relat­ed to CMT:

  • Auto­nom­ic nerves may also be affect­ed, which may explain troph­ic dis­tur­bances.
  • Bal­ance dis­or­ders are com­mon
  • Blad­der weak­ness can also be asso­ci­at­ed with CMT (this has always been ruled out in the past)
  • CMT is often only part of anoth­er dis­ease, which can fur­ther com­pli­cate the diag­no­sis
  • A high CK lev­el is not uncom­mon in affect­ed indi­vid­u­als and should be con­sid­ered a con­se­quence rather than a cause.
  • Many con­comi­tant symp­toms of CMT are still unex­plained, such as the hol­low foot that occurs in many affect­ed indi­vid­u­als.

Anoth­er human genet­ic test can be that all close rel­a­tives (who are also affect­ed) get togeth­er for a pool test. This involves com­par­ing everyone’s genes to see if a genet­ic defect is not seen in all of them. This nar­rows down the pos­si­ble sus­pects.

How­ev­er, the final diag­no­sis remains dif­fi­cult, main­ly because not all oth­er dis­eases can be ruled out. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, even in spe­cial mus­cle cen­ters, the inter­est of physi­cians to con­tin­ue on the path of diag­no­sis is notice­ably decreas­ing. As a patient, you are then at the mer­cy of the doc­tors, because at some point there are no more con­tact points that you can go to for fur­ther help. It is there­fore all the more impor­tant that at least the fam­i­ly doc­tor, neu­rol­o­gist and, if nec­es­sary, ortho­pe­dist stand by the patient.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *